Turbocapitalist |
04-21-2024 11:48 PM |
Quote:
This era will show a decrease in intellectual debates among colleagues, a sign of the time that computer scientists have already warned us about.’
|
It has already happened. Medical doctors spend by far much more time playing with the software on the computers on their desks than they do interacting with their patients. Furthermore, rather than diagnosing, the younger ones are pushed to play the odds regarding problems based on the statistical probability of a diagnosis in the general population instead of analyzing the constellation of symptoms in the patient in front of them.
In the 1980s, there used to be decision trees called expert systems which could amplify medical doctors' skill and ability in regards to effecting a diagnosis based on observed symptoms. But that was not AI and is nothing more than a codification of the decision process which a skilled, experienced medical doctor would be going through anyway base on observations. However, it is much better at catching edge cases. It still requires though from the medical doctor and, especially, the ability to identify symptoms. Good luck in getting "AI" to differentiate between an abrasion and a rash etc, for example.
Now that I made the mistake of commenting, especially since the JAMA link seems dead, I belatedly ask what was the tie-in to Linux or even to FOSS?
|