LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by mr805newbie It would be funny if Microsoft was the one who developed it and getting royalties.
Actually MS is developing their own Linux and it will be called MS Linux. It would've cost $249.99 if you preordered (Not sure if it's available or how much it sells for.). Supposedly it was released in November 2003 (According to the website www.mslinux.org). Can anyone confirm this? I haven't seen it on store shelfs. They also have a 1-900-MS-LINUX number for tech support and of course you can only put it on a single machine (In a typical MS way.).
How do you know it's really fake? This personally worries me. This really worries me: http://www.zdnet.com.au/reviews/soft...75212%2C00.htm That ZDNet Australia site's article seems to support the theory that MS is secretly building MS Linux.
Originally posted by Craigwd How do you know it's really fake? This personally worries me. This really worries me: http://www.zdnet.com.au/reviews/soft...75212%2C00.htm That ZDNet Australia site's article seems to support the theory that MS is secretly building MS Linux.
Are you serious? First of all, it hasn't been updated in probably 2 years. The headline reads: "MS Linux: Shipping in November 2003" and off to the side it has a column that reads
"Microsoft Invades Cuba:
Microsoft's plan to invade cuba and overthrow the government has succeeded....."
And lastly the whois info is:
Registrant Organization:SUID Productions
Registrant Street1:1141 Meadow Creek Dr
Registrant Street2:Suite 279
Registrant City:Irving
Registrant State/Province:Texas
Registrant Postal Code:75038
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.8177975702
Registrant Email:mike@milliways.net
And that link you just supplied, its old, it was a commentary letter which probably wasn't even mailed to Microsoft.
And to me the internet doesn't always tell the truth, I'd have to say 95% of it is fake itself..
So lets do ourselves a favor and if you really want to discuss this old www.mslinux.org site, search to find the one thread we possibly still have open (cause its been mentioned way too many times here) about it and take the discussion there and not in this forum or thread.
My best search yielded eight pages! I need more concise results than that. Maybe you could help me find one trickykid, I don't like going through five plus pages of search results.
Originally posted by Craigwd My best search yielded eight pages! I need more concise results than that. Maybe you could help me find one trickykid, I don't like going through five plus pages of search results.
Well, you'd have to consider talking about mslinux.org is an off topic so doing a search on mslinux.org and searching just in the General forum brought up 24 results..
I thought sellling Linux is illegal, so I can see ALOT of court battles if MS tries to commercialize the Linux code. So what are they really selling when you buy Linare Linux? Is it worth it to buy it or is it just as good to stick to a Mandrake, or Suse Distribution?
Originally posted by mr805newbie I thought sellling Linux is illegal, so I can see ALOT of court battles if MS tries to commercialize the Linux code. So what are they really selling when you buy Linare Linux? Is it worth it to buy it or is it just as good to stick to a Mandrake, or Suse Distribution?
Redhat sells Linux, so does Suse, Mandrake, Linspire and many other distros. You can't legally sell Linux for a profit but you can sell it if your providing support, box, manuals, cd's it comes on, etc. And all of these companies provide the source code for their products as well, totally legal.
So Microsoft could get their own distro rolling and sell it if they wanted... it would be perfectly legal. But then they would be the laughing stock of the world, the number one software maker relies on Linux, a community driven OS hacked by programmers in their spare time, to make money and win more customers.
Ok, so u guys want some suggestions for Linare. I've got a couple regarding UI.
#1
What is the deal with the input buttons always being literally at the bottom of the window with little or no space between the button and the lower corner. How about moving the buttons away from the corners a bit.
#2
Also on the installation screens, the flowerly logo is up in the the middle of the screen often times, even though there is a static version of the logo in the upper left hand corner. Seems redundant to me. Why not lose it altogether. It's uncessary bloat and looks goofy. And why not move the input buttons to the green bar in the center of the window of the right pane.
Originally posted by maximsu_m3 Ok, so u guys want some suggestions for Linare. I've got a couple regarding UI.
#1
What is the deal with the input buttons always being literally at the bottom of the window with little or no space between the button and the lower corner. How about moving the buttons away from the corners a bit.
#2
Also on the installation screens, the flowerly logo is up in the the middle of the screen often times, even though there is a static version of the logo in the upper left hand corner. Seems redundant to me. Why not lose it altogether. It's uncessary bloat and looks goofy. And why not move the input buttons to the green bar in the center of the window of the right pane.
Just some thoughts.
-m
This is probably best suited in the Linare forum, or directly to the manufacturers of Linare itself.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.