ArchThis Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Disclaimer: Generally speaking this topic is about my experience with Arch and my early impressions with it.
A little backstory: In the past I tried Arch a few times (the last time was in 2015), never stick with it (lack of Linux experience back then) and I was afraid of the "too fast updates policy".
Now the story is different: After running Debian Stable (Jessie, after that Stretch) for 3 years, I said to myself "You should give Arch a chance one more time." and I installed it on my spare laptop...
First Impressions
The installer and the initial setup was my favorite part. I don't understand how a text based installer can be a hard "experience". The Wiki is just perfect and mind blowing (I even used it when I searched for specific Debian packages because I usually assembly the install myself)! It went really fast and the boot was about 2 seconds in total...
First, I had slight annoyances with the idea that I must enable manually every service but thinking about this - this is the best option.
Then it was time to install my "minimal setup" for KDE (I always avoid 80% of the KDE apps and install what I use). I was pretty amazed that they had small dependencies unlike Debian, where I explicitly selected what I want to avoid the dependency wave. To my surprise KDE was not only responsive but very stable and well integrated DE (that comes from month of using Plasma 5.8.6).
Next on the "To Do List" was checking for drivers and after installing the Intel drivers and running "dmesg" for a quick look, everything worked. I said "Man, why everything works?"! I expected to add missing firmware and stuff, find that my Bluetooth is not working or my WiFi but nope (this is not my usual Debian setup after all).
And lastly, I installed the LTS versions of the packages where possible (LTS kernel, LO Still) and technically I slowed down the updates. One day is too little to judge but I'm really impressed so far!
PS: I still love and use Debian Stable on the other laptop. I just pointed out what I liked in Arch and why I prefer it now for my main system.
The installer and the initial setup was my favorite part. I don't understand how a text based installer can be a hard "experience". The Wiki is just perfect and mind blowing
so I go this blank black screen, no means to refer to arch wiki or and other wiki for that matter for instructions. I got a usb sick with every other distros known to mankind created and I do not need a wiki or two laptops/desktops to help me install a Linux distro. that Arch installing part is by far out dated. that is why mankind invented another means to install Linux.
so I go this blank black screen, no means to refer to arch wiki or and other wiki for that matter for instructions. I got a usb sick with every other distros known to mankind created and I do not need a wiki or two laptops/desktops to help me install a Linux distro. that Arch installing part is by far out dated. that is why mankind invented another means to install Linux.
It's my personal opinion, mate. If you don't like it - don't use it.
You can always add the mainline kernel too and select between the two at boot. The fast updates aren't bad, sometimes a little bumpy but I run -Syu almost everyday and find that seems to work best, others might not agree. I find it easier to deal with the bumps in the smaller daily batches than waiting a month or so (sometimes work away from home for long times and those are usually the more involved updates).
Sure. Each to his/her own. I like the text-based installer on Arch. It meets my needs as all of the operating systems that I like don't come with GUI installers.
This is the Arch Plasma desktop on my Dell 780. Very light and fast.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.