Linux - EnterpriseThis forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am currently in the phase of deploying a server that could cater up to 150,000 records. This 150 000 records will be stored in each of its own folder (that means 150 000 folder). I was informed by a friend that in RH enterprise there is a folder limitations. We could only create up to 30 000 folder only
From my point of view that for a enterprise OS, this does not make sense. Anybody who have any experience regarding storage large info?
If helps, the server is running raid 5.
Does this limitations that my friend said was true???
Sounds like FUD. If there is a limit it is probably a filesystem limit, not an OS limit. And I doubt that it would be a round number like 50,000 but rather a number divisible by 8 and significantly more than 50,000.
Generally speaking a folder is nothing more than a special type of file. Given that generalization, 50,000 is definitely a low figure since I'm sure I've got well over that many files on several of my systems.
I agree with MasterC. Where did you friend get that information from??? To point out that this is indeed false information, I do have a server that has a filesystem with over 1 million folders on RHEL 4 Update 4.
Well i am not sure where did he actually got the information, i just posted here just for confirmation. Because from my personal point of view, it should be able to cater more. I have been linux for few years already and never came across this issue until a friend brought it up.
From my point of view that for a enterprise OS, this does not make sense. Anybody who have any experience regarding storage large info?
Just as an addition, when talking about Linux distributions, any regular distribution doesn't put any more limits for you than "enterprise operating systems" do. RHELs are largely based on opensource code, GPL'd software and so on, and use filesystems common to other Linux variants also. It's not like in Windows world that you need to buy a more expensive version of their Server product to be able to do something more freely.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.