LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Unfortunately this is Cloudflare's doing and apparently jeremy is not able to do something about it.
We can make good guesses as to why CF takes these actions, but nothing more ultimately.
I'm pretty sure (tm) that the browser has nothing to do with it, but who knows, it might be a contributing factor to trigger CF's blocking.
Have a good look at the thread linked by boughtonp.
It's still happening and seems quite arbitrary. The latest incident seems to be that it blocks uname, which I would think is a common, innocuous utility.
(One trick to getting past the filters is to hide an empty [b] [/b] or similar empty markup inside the name to break up the string.)
const char* agent = "Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 15_3_1 "
"like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) "
"CriOS/103.0.4844.47 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1";
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QCoreApplication::setOrganizationName("CookieViewer");
QApplication app(argc, argv);
What I am trying to write, been working on it halfway for a while, A little tool that will get the format colors made in a syntax highlighting text editor like geany, and format a post suitable for the BB, with those colors, using the BB color/header/bold tags.
I've always thought that would be nifty. So that all bash, python, awk posts I made to this board, could also be syntax highlighted. But doing it manually is not an option, not unless it is 3 lines.
I'm not there yet.
What Turbocapitalist posted, never thought of that before. That adds to it.
What I am trying to write, been working on it halfway for a while, A little tool that will get the format colors made in a syntax highlighting text editor like geany, and format a post suitable for the BB, with those colors, using the BB color/header/bold tags.
That's entirely off-topic. i.e. you need to start a new thread.
(Or stick to using "Preview Post" without actually posting.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.