LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604
Rep:
Cleanup is almost completed now. I apologize for the inconvenience. If any legitimate accounts were banned or legitimate posts removed, please let me know.
I watched this develop overnight - it was well orchestrated IMO.
There was a definite not-so-subtle signature in most, but not all that I saw early on which I do not want to post visibly here, but use your shell/sed skills on this...
It simply is not possible to win the spam wars with an open forum policy.
I do not know the best way for LQ to handle it, but it will get worse - there are a near infinite number of low-grade morons armed with a potentially infinite number of bots, out there. Ultimately you just have to make it inaccessible to them.
And it is a fair bet that more than a few of the sorry b***ards learn their limited skills form LQ...
Is it from North Korea? Did someone of us insult Kim?
I tend to think it is more likely to be iitiated by some self-important western entity such as an offended rights-horader or authority who feels threatened by free exchange of information and the concept of shared human knowledge. They have the access and the resources... the diaper wearing imbeciles who are then manipulated to participate are clueless but don't care about the motivation... they just think it is kewl to beat civilized man into the dirt for fun and profit, or for no reason at all...
I think jeremy needs to change the registration process. For example, yahoo sends a code to the mobile phone to verify yourself.
Also, the admin for the pclinuxos.com forum disabled the usual registration process. In order to have an account in the pclinuxos.com's forum, you'll have to send the admin an email with the desired username and password. Then the admin sends an email to notify the user the account is now active and to change the password.
I think it needs more than a tighter signup process though. There must be some madatory, dead end, moderation process for new members - something effective that they simply cannot bypass.
Obviously that means the end of the truly open forum model, but I think that is where we are as a global society at this time, in more ways than internet access controls. The game as we have tried to play it is simply over.
Until the nature of man can be changed, we need a better model.
One option that wouldn't eliminate it, but would at least slow it down (and would also slow down some legitimate users who NEED slowing down), is to implement a limit of one new thread per day per user.
I think it needs more than a tighter signup process though. There must be some madatory, dead end, moderation process for new members - something effective that they simply cannot bypass.
Obviously that means the end of the truly open forum model, but I think that is where we are as a global society at this time, in more ways than internet access controls. The game as we have tried to play it is simply over.
Until the nature of man can be changed, we need a better model.
Agreed-
In other Linux forums when a new member registers you have to wait for a Moderator or and Administrator to approve the new membership.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.