LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu
User Name
Password
Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-09-2010, 07:45 PM   #1
sundry_50
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: knoppix/debian
Posts: 38
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 11
Old xp, new 10.04.1, no grub menu, boots directly to xp


Old xp drive boot directly in without grub menu offer. Ubuntu 10.04.01 was installed on a new drive.
Have tried the same method on another machine with existing xp. Second drive was not new. It just worked.
Have tried several reinstalls, including with advanced on both sda and sdb.
Have tried sudo grub-install --root-directory= to both sda and sdb.
All directories are visible on sdb.
---------From a live CD
:~$ grep_menuentry /media/mydrive/boot/grub/grub.cfg
menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.32-24-generic' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.32-24-generic (recovery mode)' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
menuentry "Memory test (memtest86+)" {
menuentry "Memory test (memtest86+, serial console 115200)" {
menuentry "Microsoft Windows XP Professional (on /dev/sda1)" {
:~$
---------
Am at wits end. First machine I am unable to install dual boot on.
 
Old 11-09-2010, 08:19 PM   #2
Larry Webb
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Crystal Beach, Texas
Distribution: Suse for mail +
Posts: 5,100
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 229Reputation: 229Reputation: 229
From terminal of your live cd can you post sudo fdisk -l results?
 
Old 11-09-2010, 08:25 PM   #3
sundry_50
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: knoppix/debian
Posts: 38

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 11
Disk /dev/sda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x76f376f3

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 9728 78140128+ 7 HPFS/NTFS

Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0008fdcf

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 1 60616 486893568 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 60616 60802 1490945 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 60616 60802 1490944 82 Linux swap / Solaris

Disk /dev/sdc: 32.0 GB, 32044064768 bytes
32 heads, 63 sectors/track, 31044 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 2016 * 512 = 1032192 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x688948fe

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdc1 * 1 31044 31292320+ b W95 FAT32

Thank you.
 
Old 11-10-2010, 06:14 AM   #4
Larry Webb
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Crystal Beach, Texas
Distribution: Suse for mail +
Posts: 5,100
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 229Reputation: 229Reputation: 229
Did you physically disconnect sda1 when you were installing ubuntu on sdb1? Is either sda1 or sdb1 sata and the other ide? In mb bios which drive is boots first?
 
Old 11-10-2010, 06:39 AM   #5
sundry_50
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: knoppix/debian
Posts: 38

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 11
Did not have either disconnected during installs. Both are ide. Tried mb bios both ways and when sdb first didn't make a difference I went back and remain at sda first.

Thanks for your response.
 
Old 11-13-2010, 09:22 AM   #6
sundry_50
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: knoppix/debian
Posts: 38

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 11
Solved. My friend's computer can't handle >137Gb drives or lba. It's an older machine and he bought the 500Gb drive on sale w/o realizing his system wouldn't handle it. I finally realized it was the new drive at fault and started running diagnostics from Western Digital. The drive is fine but the system just doesn't have the ability to run it.

Thank you Larry for spinning me toward the right direction.

Last edited by sundry_50; 11-13-2010 at 09:24 AM. Reason: grammar and thanks to poster
 
  


Reply

Tags
boot, dual, grub2



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
grub doesn't show boot menu, just goes directly into Linux ? trien27 Fedora 27 10-14-2010 09:55 PM
Boot grub menu list is accidentally removed from Ubuntu Jaunty and sysem boots to gru murtyvonna Ubuntu 2 08-11-2009 12:19 PM
(sabayon)add a option in the grub menu where it only boots into the terminal deathalele Linux - Distributions 3 11-25-2008 07:20 AM
Fedora 9 boots (long delay) as single core if I go to GRUB menu, otherwise boots fine saravkrish Fedora 1 05-27-2008 07:59 AM
/grub/menu.lst file disappeared but computer still boots (grub) rrrssssss Linux - General 5 04-08-2007 09:02 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration